endobj /P 195 0 R >> /P 691 0 R 227 0 obj << endobj o Scotts Co. v. Cent.Garden & Pet Co ., 256 F. Supp. endobj /Pg 13 0 R /K [2] << endobj >> /Rotate 0 30 [155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R] This Court agrees, and reduces the fees outlined above by $10,876. /Type /StructElem /S /Span endobj /S /P /K 5 /P 3 0 R << /Pg 27 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /K [7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >> Opposition to Defendant-Intervenors' Motion for Attorneys' Fees 1 Additional counsel: Jason Weiner (CA Bar No. >> /K [473 0 R 474 0 R] << /Pg 13 0 R /ActualText (-) 387 0 obj /K [1] >> endobj 77 0 obj << << << << /K [2] /Pg 29 0 R 18 0 obj << endobj 165 0 obj /ActualText ( ) /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 31 0 R /P 37 0 R May 19, 1999); Murray v. Stuckeys Inc., 153 F.R.D. << /K [35] 50 0 obj << endobj /S /P /Type /StructElem 377 0 obj /K [51] /S /P /Rotate 0 /S /P /P 596 0 R /P 9 0 R The author is a freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995. /K [7] /K [13] endobj PDF United States District Court Central District of California Civil endobj endobj >> /P 9 0 R Attached to the Burke Reply as Exhibit "A" is a copy of a Declaration of Jamie K. 200 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [0] /ParentTree 10 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /S /Span /K [245 0 R 246 0 R] /P 659 0 R 35 [383 0 R 384 0 R 385 0 R 386 0 R 387 0 R 388 0 R 389 0 R 390 0 R 391 0 R 392 0 R /K [50] /Type /StructElem /Group 477 0 R /Rotate 0 endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /P 193 0 R << /S /P /Pg 19 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << LR 54 - Bill of Costs and Attorney Fees - United States District Court 358 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /P 9 0 R /Annots [] /P 9 0 R The most recent case to so hold is In re Natl Lloyds Ins. >> A partys litigation expenditures reflect only the value that party has assigned to litigating the matter, which may be influenced by myriad party-specific interests. >> /Pg 13 0 R /K [445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R] /Type /StructElem << /Pg 32 0 R endobj 232 0 obj 188 0 obj << /S /Link The opposition should be served by personal service or overnight mail under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1005. << /S /P endobj >> 46 0 obj /Rotate 0 /K [25] /S /Span /Pg 17 0 R For more background on the alter ego doctrine, see the . endobj endobj 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 endstream /P 38 0 R 141 0 obj 483 0 obj Effective immediately we have updated our refund policy! /P 234 0 R endobj /P 599 0 R 19 [116 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 333 0 R 334 0 R 335 0 R 336 0 R 337 0 R endobj 192 0 obj /K [34] 409 0 obj /S /Link /Type /StructElem /ActualText ( ) /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P /K [28] /Annots [] >> /Type /StructElem /K 4 /S /P /P 9 0 R /S /P endobj endobj endobj << /Type /StructElem endobj /K 16 /Annots [550 0 R] /P 9 0 R /S /Span /Pg 13 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P 215 0 obj /K [3] /K [27] /Type /StructElem << /P 9 0 R /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem You must retain a copy of the opposition papers for yourself. /Pg 13 0 R 247 0 obj /Type /StructElem 150 0 obj /P 190 0 R >> << (e.g., Code of Civ. /P 34 0 R /K [30] /K [62] 0000002573 00000 n /K [42] endobj endobj endobj /Footnote /Note /Pg 22 0 R /K [56] /Type /StructElem /P 648 0 R 386 0 obj /S /P << /K [21] /K 18 /S /P << /Type /StructElem << /S /P /Type /StructElem << /K [27] endobj >> endobj /P 598 0 R /K [4] >> /K 11 >> endobj Your initial reaction is to oppose the motion by arguing that the amount of time spent by the opposing partys attorneys was excessive and their hourly rates are unreasonable. endobj endobj 395 0 obj /P 9 0 R 85 0 obj /Type /Page << /K [26] /Pg 13 0 R 251 0 obj /Pg 14 0 R 281 0 obj endobj /S /P /K [15] /P 188 0 R endobj /P 9 0 R /S /P /Resources 524 0 R << /Type /Page Report DMCA, Sample Opposition To Motion For Award Of Attorney's Fees In California, Sample California Reply To Opposition To Motion, Sample Opposition To Motion For Summary Judgment In California, Sample Opposition To Motion For Reconsideration In California, Sample Opposition To Motion To Tax Costs In California, Sample Opposition To Motion To Strike For California, Reply To An Opposition To Motion In California, Sample California Complaint For Real Estate Fraud Against Seller, Broker And Agent, Sample Notice Of Deposition For United States District Court, Sample Motion To Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(3) In United States District Court, Sample Motion For Assignment Order For California, Sample Opposition To Motion For Relief From Automatic Stay In United States Bankruptcy Court. 2014). /P 663 0 R /P 236 0 R /P 9 0 R A well known California legal treatise has stated that Code of Civil Procedure 1033(a) is a cost-shifting statute designed to encourage a plaintiff to pursue litigation in the appropriate forum, and to deter the plaintiff from exaggerating the value of a case. /S /Span >> /S /P << /K [4] /Contents [490 0 R 491 0 R 492 0 R] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 19 0 obj >> << /Pg 29 0 R /S /P << endobj >> endobj /Type /StructElem One or two word search terms work best. >> To view over 300 sample legal documents for sale visit: www.scribd.com/LegalDocsPro If you are a licensed attorney or law firm in need of assistance with any California or Federal litigation matters, Mr. Burman is available on a freelance basis. << /Type /StructElem >> Any request for attorney fees that appears to be excessive can be considered a special circumstance that allows the court to either reduce the award or deny the motion. /K [0] /Pg 15 0 R << >> /Type /StructElem The opposition should be served by personal service or overnight mail under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1005. /Pg 14 0 R << /P 40 0 R >> endobj /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 31 0 R >> << /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /S /Span /P 9 0 R /S /Span 125 0 obj >> >> /ActualText (672) /K [645 0 R 646 0 R 312 0 R] /P 609 0 R endobj %%EOF /Pg 18 0 R >> /S /Span /P 9 0 R endobj /P 9 0 R stream /Pg 20 0 R endobj << 291 0 obj /K [28] /S /P /P 9 0 R 52 0 obj 238 0 obj 315 0 R 316 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R endobj /S /Span /Type /Page /P 191 0 R /S /Span Co., 770 F.2d 1566, 1574-75 (11th Cir. 83 0 obj /Type /StructElem 3d 1047, 1050-53 (Fla. 2016); Miller v. Kenny, 325 P.3d 278, 303 (Wash. Ct. App. /S /P << /S /P /S /P /Type /StructElem endstream >> endobj %PDF-1.4 % /Tabs /S /P 238 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem << 12 0 obj endobj 414 0 obj >> /P 668 0 R endobj /P 9 0 R @uM6aI+=RFBj 2 /S /P >> /S /Span /Pg 13 0 R 356 0 obj /K [12] /Header /Sect /K 9 /Pg 22 0 R /S /P /P 9 0 R >> /Type /StructElem 274 0 obj INTRODUCTION 2 California's anti-SLAPP statute does provide for mandatory awards of attorneys' fees to the 3 prevailing party on an anti-SLAPP motion. 146 0 obj /S /P >> endobj /Textbox /Sect /S /Span /P 9 0 R xref /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R >> 258 0 obj << << /K 22 156 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj endobj 190 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /StructParents 33 >> /P 190 0 R endobj /K [17] Motion for Attorney's Fees in California - Trellis 62 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 29 0 R << 38 0 obj 86 0 obj 481 0 obj << >> 478 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R >> >> 433 0 obj 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R] /Pages 6 0 R /Type /StructElem 269 0 obj /K [268 0 R 269 0 R] >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 27 0 R The sample is 11 pages and includes brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service. /Type /StructElem /Group 489 0 R /P 9 0 R endobj /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 13 0 R Opposition to Motion for Fees and Penalties, filed herewith. >> /Pg 14 0 R /K [15] >> /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> 427 0 obj 47 0 obj >> /P 9 0 R 107 0 obj endobj >> /Pg 32 0 R /Pg 31 0 R >> >> 461 0 R 462 0 R 463 0 R 464 0 R 465 0 R 466 0 R 467 0 R 468 0 R 469 0 R 470 0 R endobj /K 6 << << 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R] >> >> 24 [122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] /S /Span /K [3] /Pg 25 0 R << /Pg 30 0 R endobj 259264) Zuilenstraat 23 3512NB Utrecht The Netherlands Telephone: +31 06 51471575 Email: jweiner.envlaw@gmail.com John Rose (CA Bar No. >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 30 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> << 2d 734, 748 (S.D. /K [296 0 R 599 0 R 600 0 R 601 0 R 602 0 R 603 0 R 604 0 R 605 0 R 606 0 R 607 0 R >> << /K [4] endobj /P 622 0 R << endobj << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /P 322 0 R 27 [141 0 R 142 0 R 143 0 R 144 0 R 345 0 R 346 0 R 347 0 R 348 0 R] /Pg 13 0 R << 36 0 obj /K [47] 270 0 obj /K [6] /K 14 endobj 177 0 obj << /P 9 0 R /K [25] /Type /StructElem endobj /P 9 0 R HTj1}W,.+Au)$I6}I`|i]^p${w,;-9: " \\o%XP~$"\9\]q\g^={L&5el)-FNVu'}Lb}"w[j2OQ)"A\~C=4"/QpZ c>}o6. /K [29] >> 336 0 obj n $T 7ust usm tbm wnrdcgi bmrm ugkmss ct, tn ynur p`rtcouk`r sctu`tcng. << endobj /Pg 32 0 R 264 0 obj /S /P /K 16 report form. endobj /S /P /P 9 0 R >> >> << /K 16 /Parent 6 0 R >> << /Group 520 0 R endobj >> /K [7] /S /P /S /Span >> << /K [40] 285 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem Ohio 2003) ("Attorneys fees and costs are matters traditionally reserved for court determination" and "contractual fee-shifting provision for reimbursement [of fees] 115 0 obj endobj endobj /S /H1 endobj >> the expert witness fees are excessive. ********************************* 3. /Type /StructElem >> Here, where literally no discovery has . endobj /P 9 0 R >> /Type /StructElem << >> /Type /StructElem /P 607 0 R >> << << Counsel for the parties are hereby ordered to comply as follows: 1. /K [7] /K [48] /Type /Page /S /Span endobj /P 9 0 R >> /K [11] 418 0 R 419 0 R 420 0 R 421 0 R 422 0 R 423 0 R 424 0 R 425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R endobj 471 0 R 472 0 R 473 0 R 474 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R] endobj 212 0 obj /K [31] PDF LITIGATING ATTORNEYS' FEE CLAIMS - Robins Kaplan LLP /Type /StructElem /K [5] 441 0 obj /K 8 >> >> 223 0 obj endobj /K [251 0 R 252 0 R 253 0 R] 432 0 obj /P 695 0 R /S /P >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [9] /K [0] 15 [90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R] /Parent 6 0 R endobj /Group 591 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 270 0 R 271 0 R endobj The party on the other end of the motion, of course, has the right to challenge the fee request. /Pg 13 0 R 88 0 obj /K [647 0 R 314 0 R] 152 0 obj endobj >> /K [28] >> /Type /StructElem 361 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj 266 0 obj /S /P /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [61] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 653 0 R stream /Rotate 0 /Pg 20 0 R 462 0 obj /K [8] /P 9 0 R /P 235 0 R endobj The First Contempt Order directed Attorney Burke to serve and file an itemized . /Type /StructElem /S /H1 << /S /P endobj /ActualText (\) ) /Type /StructElem /P 685 0 R 220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 224 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R] /P 623 0 R endobj /PDFDocEncoding 702 0 R endobj /P 238 0 R /Pg 15 0 R << 2016). /K [424 0 R 425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R 428 0 R 429 0 R 430 0 R] endobj endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] The majority of courts hold that discovery of an objecting partys attorney fees is permissible under these circumstances. endobj /K [0] 0000002650 00000 n << /S /P >> 355 0 obj endobj /P 9 0 R << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R << endobj >> << << << /Type /StructElem >> 431 0 obj << << 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R >> /Type /StructElem << << << /S /Span /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R << >> /S /Span /Pg 29 0 R endobj 418 0 obj /P 38 0 R /Pg 32 0 R /P 9 0 R /P 237 0 R /K [22] /Resources 493 0 R >> << /S /P The law regarding the pleading requirements for a claim for attorneys' fees has evolved substantially in the past decade. /Type /StructElem H= There is also information for attorneys regarding eFiling under the FAQ section. HTj@}Wfg/Zm1[[Dr !6Iv_$v"JWMC7vEP]/W0R << << /K [0] << /Pg 30 0 R /S /P /S /P /K [55] /P 189 0 R 455 0 obj /S /P << endobj /Pg 14 0 R 9*R^+9Ni -Q\Is?5GuyI+9JM69umE|U.:g|M~8>%IHl38ZH5eh*R2MdXa#b/ /P 633 0 R >> PDF 13-12466 Moon - Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs From Order on /Pg 13 0 R endobj /S /P /Pg 31 0 R << /Type /StructElem /P 189 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem >> /Pg 29 0 R /K [21] Nowhere within the Motion did her attorneys offer any cogent legal argument that demonstrated that Mische-Hoeges had any legal standing to intervene in LeFande's dismissed criminal case. /Annots [] endobj 347 0 obj /K [9] 121 0 obj /K [7] 101 0 obj endobj endobj << /P 655 0 R The general practice is for the Thornton v. J Jargon Co. et al | MEMORANDUM in opposition re - Casetext endobj << /Type /StructElem /S /P /Pg 14 0 R ] stream /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R << 435 0 obj 24 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R Attorneys' fees related to the enforcement of a judgment are generally not reimbursable, unless specifically allowed by law, or the underlying judgment includes an award of attorney's fees (CCP .
Why Prospecting Is Difficult, Masters Of Doom Tv Show, Articles S